USPTO serial 85162153
BES+
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIS, PAMELA Y
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BES+?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York Battery and Energy Storage Technology Consortium, Inc.
Albany, NY
Other trademarks owned by New York Battery and Energy Storage Technology Consortium, Inc.
New York Battery and Energy Storage Technology Consortium, Inc.
Albany, NY
Other trademarks owned by New York Battery and Energy Storage Technology Consortium, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Victor A. Cardona
VICTOR A. CARDONA HESLIN ROTHENBERG FARLEY & MESITI P.C.5 COLUMBIA CIRALBANY, NY 12203-5180UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Association services, namely, promoting the development of advanced battery and energy storage technologies developed by association members, uniting battery and energy storage companies, researchers and labs to pursue common technology initiatives, providing access to advanced battery and energy storage testing and characterization capabilities; promoting the economic development of New York State as a center for energy storage technologies, and placing New York State as an important focus of energy storage development in the nation; Association services, namely, promoting the interests of the advanced battery and energy storage technology industry by providing services to conduct research and development of manufacturing techniques for said industry; Project management services for others for business purposes in the fields of advanced battery and energy storage technologies, and research and development relating to advanced battery and energy storage technologies; Administration and management of research grants; Writing of grant proposals for others in the fields of advanced battery and energy storage technologies; Consulting services in the fields of energy usage management, energy efficiency, and advanced battery and energy storage technologies | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2012 |
| 041 | Education services, namely, providing live and on-line classes, seminars, conferences and workshops in the fields of advanced battery and energy storage technologies, clean energy, and energy efficiency | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2012 |
| 042 | Providing an on-line searchable database of information containing information about the presence and availability of testing and manufacturing equipment and capabilities in the fields of advanced battery and energy storage technologies for scientific and research purposes | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by New York Battery and Energy Storage Technology Consortium, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by New York Battery and Energy Storage Technology Consortium, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BES+
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 14, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 9, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2013 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 27, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 5, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 10, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 21, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 3, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 8, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 8, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |