USPTO serial 85163672
NATIONAL COLLABORATION FOR FAMILIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4127048Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 10, 2012
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NATIONAL COLLABORATION FOR FAMILIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
B. Brett Heavner
B BRETT HEAVNER FINNEGAN HENDERSON ET AL901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4432UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed publications, namely, brochures and studies in the nature of research reports pertaining to health, human services, family, youth, community, and social issues | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 14, 2012 |
| 035 | Association services, namely, promoting the interests of organizations in the health, human, family, youth and community development fields; providing information and research in the field of government affairs and political issues as they relate to heath, human and community development, human services, families and youth; public policy research services; government relations consultancy services; lobbying services, namely, promoting the interests of families and youth in the fields of legislation and regulation; promoting public awareness of family, youth and social issues, individual and professional development and the importance of the nonprofit health and human services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 7, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by National Human Services Assembly
- Other trademarks owned by National Human Services Assembly
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named NATIONAL COLLABORATION FOR FAMILIES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 10, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 8, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 20, 2012 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 20, 2012 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 16, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 10, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 11, 2011 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 11, 2011 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 11, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 8, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |