USPTO serial 85165417
G
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with G?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jane Shay Wald
JANE SHAY WALD IRELL & MANELLA LLP1800 AVENUE OF THE STARS STE 900LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-4276UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | watches | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 27, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 8, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2013 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 25, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 30, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 14, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| May 11, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 18, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 8, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 9, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |