USPTO serial 85166321
FREE IS BETTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COWARD, KATHRYN E
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FREE IS BETTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mountain View, CA
Mountain View, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Linda G. Henry, Esq.
LINDA G HENRY FENWICK & WEST LLP801 CALIFORNIA STMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041-1990UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Electronic tax return filing services; providing online tax analysis, tax calculation, tax planning, and tax return preparation services; consultation services in the fields of tax calculation, tax return preparation, and tax audits; tax consultation and advisory services; providing news, advice, opinions, and information in the fields of taxes, tax returns, tax planning, management of tax files, preparation of tax returns, and electronic filing of tax returns | ABANDONED | Dec 29, 2008 |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software for tax planning, tax calculation, and tax return preparation and filing; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable computer software for organizing, tracking and reporting tax-deductible expenses; transaction processing software, namely, providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for processing tax payments; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting problems with computer software and online services via telephone, e-mail and other means | ABANDONED | Dec 29, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2012 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 22, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 6, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 6, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2011 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 22, 2011 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 22, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 23, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |