USPTO serial 85167238
M
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with M?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
551 12 Jonkoping, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin A. Thompson
Kevin A. Thompson Ladas & Parry LLP224 S. Michigan, Suite 1600Chicago, IL 60604UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Paper pulp; wood pulp for manufacturing purposes; cellulose pulp for manufacturing purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 003 | Cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations; abrasive paper | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Paper and cardboard; goods made from paper and cardboard not included in other classes, namely, fine arts paper, thin print papers, exclusive papers and cardboard for packaging; printed matter, namely, brochures, product sheets, catalogues, periodicals and information materials; plastic materials for packaging (not included in other classes), namely, plastic bags, plastic foil/film for foodstuffs, plastic foil/film for mailing; thin paper; interleaving paper; heat transfer paper; protective paper for goods; carbonized paper; laminated paper; plastic laminated paper; paper materials for packaging; bags envelopes, pouches of paper or plastics, for packaging; plastic for wrapping or packaging; plastic film for wrapping and packaging; decor papers used for surface upgrading of wood based panels by being printed and/or impregnated and/or laminated; impregnated paper used for surface upgrading by being printed and/or laminated for use in manufacturing of goods such as plane furniture, decoration panels and floors | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Plastics in extruded form for use in manufacture; packing, stopping and insulating materials; insulating paper for cables; insulating paper for transformers; laminated paper for electrical laminates, namely, insulation board components; plastic film, not for packaging, for the building industry; cellulose foil, other than for packaging, for the building industry; paper foil, other than for packaging, for the building industry; impregnated foil for use in manufacturing of goods such as plane furniture, decoration panels and floors; plastic cling film for use in palletization | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Resin impregnated papers for building construction | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2015 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 30, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 21, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 21, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 28, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 11, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |