USPTO serial 85167341
ANGLOGOLD ASHANTI TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION CONSORTIUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4733806Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 12, 2015
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRIDGETT G
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ANGLOGOLD ASHANTI TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION CONSORTIUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Johannesburg 2001, ZA
Johannesburg 2001, ZA
Johannesburg 2001, ZA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Ehrlich
DAVID EHRLICH FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.4 TIMES SQUARE, 17TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | advisory and information services relating to mining and extraction services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | telecommunication and communication services, namely, providing an online forum for technology in the minerals and refining industry; providing an on-line forum for the interchange, transmission, sharing, access and storage of information in the minerals mining and refining industry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | scientific research; scientific research and development; industrial design services; industrial research and analysis services in the field of mineral mining exploration, mining extraction, ore processing and refining | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Anglogold Ashanti Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Anglogold Ashanti Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Anglogold Ashanti Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ANGLOGOLD ASHANTI TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION CONSORTIUM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 24, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 4, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 9, 2015 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 19, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 31, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 28, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 27, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 24, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |