USPTO serial 85170248
IN THE NIGHT GARDEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOVELACE, JAMES B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IN THE NIGHT GARDEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Buckinghamshire, GB
Buckinghamshire, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elizabeth A. Corradino
ELIZABETH A. CORRADINO MOSES & SINGER LLP405 LEXINGTON AVE 12TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10174-1299UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Games, toys and playthings, namely, plush toys, musical toys, 2D and 3D jigsaw puzzles, manipulative puzzles and cube-type puzzles; inflatable bath and pool toys; board games; electronic toys and electronic games, namely, arcade-type electronic video games; game display apparatus and instruments, namely, hand-held games with liquid crystal displays; infant play sets for interactive and reactive play, namely, crib carousels, crib gyms, crib mobiles; dolls and dolls' clothing; accessories for dolls; dolls' houses; dolls' furniture; dolls' furniture accessories; teddy bears; toy action figures; toy vehicles; scale model vehicles; toy building structures and toy vehicle tracks; pogo sticks; stilts for recreational purposes; scooters, namely, toy scooters; toboggans; snow sleds for recreational use, bob-sleighs, snowboards, surf boards; skateboards; soft sculpture toys; plush toys; puppets; marionettes; balloons; novelties for parties, namely, novelty paper face masks; toy face masks; toy masks; costume masks; kites; decorations for Christmas trees; Christmas trees of synthetic material; roller skates; skating boots with skates attached; gloves for games, namely, baseball gloves; baseball and softball bats; playing balls, namely, play ground balls, sports balls, foam sports balls, footballs, baseballs and soccer balls; marbles; paddling pools, namely, inflatable paddling pool for recreational use; play swimming pools; inflatable bath and pool toys; toy pails; toy shovels; swimming aids, namely, armbands and rings used as floatation devices for recreational use; arm pads for use in athletics, namely, baseball, basketball, cycling, football, hockey, martial arts, soccer, skateboarding and wrestling; shin pads for use in athletics, namely, baseball, basketball, cycling, football, hockey, martial arts, skateboarding, soccer and wrestling; and knee pads for use in baseball, basketball, cycling, football, hockey, martial arts, soccer, skateboarding and wrestling | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 23, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 19, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 5, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 16, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 21, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2014 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2014 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 6, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 29, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 4, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 17, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 22, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 2, 2011 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 23, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 23, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 12, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 12, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 12, 2011 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 12, 2011 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 12, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 10, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |