USPTO serial 85170788
JUICYSTAR07
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JUICYSTAR07?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nancy V. Stephens
NANCY V STEPHENS FOSTER PEPPER PLLC1111 3RD AVENUESUITE 3400SEATTLE, WA 98101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Body and beauty care cosmetics; Cosmetic creams; Cosmetic preparations; Cosmetics; Make-up; Make-up for the face and body | ABANDONED | — |
| 014 | Jewelry; Key chains as jewellery; Pendants; Watches | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | Belts; Jackets; Pants; Shorts; Skirts; T-shirts; Tops; Undergarments | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, personal appearances by a cyberstar personality; Production and distribution of videos in the field of fashion, beauty, trends and style; Providing a website for entertainment purposes where users can view and post comments featuring fashion, beauty, trends and style | ABANDONED | Aug 3, 2008 |
| 044 | Providing a web site featuring photographic, audio, video and prose presentations featuring beauty information | ABANDONED | Aug 3, 2008 |
| 045 | Providing a web site featuring photographic, audio, video and prose presentations featuring fashion and fashion trends and style | ABANDONED | Aug 3, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EBIP, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by EBIP, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Scott Fowler, parent of Laura Fowler (also known as Blair Fowler)
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named JUICYSTAR07
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2012 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 13, 2011 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 3, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 3, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 28, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 28, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 20, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 11, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |