USPTO serial 85171576
RICO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RICO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Samuel F. Pamias-Portalatin
SAMUEL F. PAMIAS-PORTALATIN HOGLUND & PAMIAS, P.S.C.256 ELEANOR ROOSEVELTSAN JUAN, PR 00918UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat, fish, poultry and game; meat extracts; preserved seafood, not live; prepared food kits composed of meat, poultry, fish, seafood, and/or vegetables and also including sauces or seasonings, ready for cooking and assembly as a meal; preserved, frozen, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; preserved, dried and cooked beans; processed olives, namely, preserved, dried and cooked olives; yucca and banana chips; dips; soups; jellies, jams, compotes; eggs, milk and milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; yogurt; edible oils and fats | ACTIVE | Aug 6, 2007 |
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; flour; preparations made from cereals, namely, cereal-based snack foods, processed cereal, breakfast cereal; bread, pastry and confectionery, namely, confectionery made of sugar, wafers; bakery goods; crackers; cookies; honey and treacle; yeast, baking powder; salt, mustard; vinegar, sauces in the form of condiments; barbecue sauce; hot sauce; tomato sauce; corn meal; food seasoning; garlic salt; edible spices; cinnamon; packaged microwavable meal kits consisting primarily of pasta or rice; rice and seasoning mix combined in unitary packages; processed grains, namely, preserved, dried and cooked and grains | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Non-alcoholic brews and beverages, namely, non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages; malt, namely, non-alcoholic malt beverage; coconut milk | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | Cooking wine | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pan American Grain Mfg. Co., Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Pan American Grain Mfg. Co., Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named RICO
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 5, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 31, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 27, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 4, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 7, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 29, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 4, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 29, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 28, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 13, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 28, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 11, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |