USPTO serial 85171885
NUTRIKIDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NUTRIKIDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Milkshakes, puddings; breakfast, lunch, dinner entrees,snacks and desserts, namely, processed cereals; cereal bars, namely, ready to eat, cereal derived food bars for use in connection with weight loss and/or weight management programs, muffins, breads, dessert bars, namely, brownies, coffee flavored dessert bars, chocolate crunch bars, peanut butter, caramel and mint chewy chocolate bars, fruit bars, nut bars, rice, sauces, namely, salsas and tomato sauces, gravies, salad dressings, frozen bars and ices, namely, fudge bars, frozen confections and ice pops, food beverage with a coffee tea or cocoa base, namely, coffee based beverages containing milk, cocoa based beverages containing milk, iced teas | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 20, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 22, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2015 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 4, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2015 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2015 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 26, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2015 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 11, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 9, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 28, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2014 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 28, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 27, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 14, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 1, 2013 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 21, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 20, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 20, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 19, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 28, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 11, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |