USPTO serial 85172999
EPICORE BY LINDA ROSS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EPICORE BY LINDA ROSS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Beverly Hills, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Non-medicated skin care products, namely, epidermal growth factor creams; non-medicated epidermal growth factor skin serum; epidermal growth factor body lotion; face and body scrubs; propolis and royal jelly creams for cosmetic purposes; propolis face and body masks for cosmetic purposes; eye creams; face beauty masks; body masks; colostrum face products, namely, beauty facial masks and beauty facial creams; aloe vera gel for cosmetic purposes; skin condition treatment cream and lotion, namely, non-medicated skin creams and lotions for all skin types; skin and body cleansers; microdermabrasion face and body scrub; skin purifiers; pulsating masks, namely, facial masks; shave creams; sunscreens; lip balms and oil control facial powder | ABANDONED | Mar 1, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2013 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 31, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 29, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 21, 2011 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 12, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 9, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 26, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 31, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 19, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |