USPTO serial 85173366
THE FOUNDRY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE FOUNDRY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kayla Carter Owens
KAYLA CARTER OWENS J.C. PENNEY CORPORATION, INC.6501 LEGACY DRPLANO, TX 75024-3698UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Apparel, specifically T-shirts, screen printed T-shirts, knit tops, woven tops, fleece tops, sweaters, vests, tank tops, casual pants, dress trousers, denims, jeans, shorts, swimwear, fleece bottoms, knit bottoms, woven bottoms, hats, socks, belts, neckties, gloves, slippers, suspenders, earmuffs, scarves, sleepwear, underwear, thermal socks and underwear, robes, suits, dress shirts, dress pants, sportcoats, blazers, topcoats, shoes, work wear, namely, cotton pants, formal wear, namely, tuxedos, tuxedo belts and dress shirts, active wear, namely, sweat pants, outerwear, namely, jackets, parkas and coats | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by J.C. Penney Private Brands, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by J. C. PENNEY PURCHASING CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by J. C. PENNEY PURCHASING CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named THE FOUNDRY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 13, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 17, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 15, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 13, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 14, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 13, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 15, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 15, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 16, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 13, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 18, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 9, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |