Drawing for ADVAYA

USPTO serial 85173817

ADVAYA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CASTRO, GIANCARLO
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ADVAYA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq.

JEFFREY B. SLADKUS, ESQ. THE SLADKUS LAW GROUP1827 POWERS FERRY RD SE BLDG 6ATLANTA, GA 30339-5687UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business development services, namely, providing start-up support for businesses of others; Franchise services, namely, offering business management assistance in the establishment and operation of hotels and restaurants; Hotel management for others; Management of hotel incentive programs of others; Restaurant management for othersACTIVE
036Real estate investment servicesACTIVE
043Hotel services; Restaurant and bar servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 30, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 30, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 29, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Nov 28, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Nov 28, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Nov 17, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Nov 17, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 28, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 3, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
May 3, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 25, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 24, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 8, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 8, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 8, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 8, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 19, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 16, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 13, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance