USPTO serial 85174456
BOSTON BAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4196076Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 21, 2012
- Examiner
- PEREZ, STEVEN M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BOSTON BAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SANA HAKIM
SANA HAKIM K&L GATES LLPP.O. BOX 1135CHICAGO, IL 60690-1135UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Seasonings; spices | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 30, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by B&G FOODS NORTH AMERICA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ACH Food Companies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ACH Food Companies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named BOSTON BAY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 21, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 15, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 16, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2012 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 15, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2012 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 29, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 1, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |