USPTO serial 85175174
KINPLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARL III, FRED
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KINPLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Diagnostic preparations and reagents for use in biochips, not for medical or veterinary purposes; chemical test kits for identifying infectious agents, nucleic acids, biological characteristics, or chemical profiles for laboratory or research use | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Diagnostic test kits consisting primarily of biological components, namely, enzymes, nucleic acids and proteins, and chemical components, namely, buffers and reagents, for use in disease testing, identifying infectious agents, nucleic acids, proteins and other biological materials, biological characteristics or chemical profiles | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Biochips for research or scientific purposes; laboratory equipment, namely, workstations for test and evaluation of nucleic acids, proteins and other biological materials, comprising biochips, software, detectors, reagents, nucleic acid purification, amplification and separation and detection components, and computer security software; portable detection and identification instruments using biochips for detecting and identifying biological substances not for medical purposes; scientific instrument, namely biochip and instrument system for crime scene investigations of DNA; computer software and hardware for analysis of biochip data and results; software for ensuring the security of electronic mail and data | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NetBio, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by NetBio, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named KINPLEX
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 2, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 27, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 27, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 18, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 14, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | IULN | ITU LETTER MAILED, NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Jan 16, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 26, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 21, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 5, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 27, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 1, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 12, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |