USPTO serial 85175202
PROJECT LINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOLTZ, ALLISON
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PROJECT LINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Jefferson Valley, NY
Jefferson Valley, NY
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management services in the nature of inviting and managing bids on building and construction projects, providing means of communication between contractors, sub-contractors, suppliers and manufacturers for the purpose of facilitating building and construction projects; creating reports to identify building and construction project and materials leads | ABANDONED | Nov 1, 2010 |
| 037 | Providing searchable databases in the fields of building and construction projects and materials required therefor | ABANDONED | Nov 1, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2012 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 9, 2012 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 9, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 9, 2012 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 5, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 22, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 25, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 19, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |