USPTO serial 85175600
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The Colony, TX
The Colony, TX
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
REBECCA LIEBOWITZ
REBECCA LIEBOWITZ VENABLEP.O. BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | restaurant services; carry-out restaurant services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 3, 2011 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 12, 2012 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 10, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 11, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2011 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |