Drawing for GRIMM CITY

USPTO serial 85176623

GRIMM CITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GRIMM CITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Lerner

MARK LERNER SATTERLEE STEPHENS BURKE & BURKE LLP230 PARK AVE RM 1130NEW YORK, NY 10169-0079UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Pre-recorded CD-ROMs and DVD-ROMs featuring audiobooks and interactive books in the nature of novels; CD-ROMs and DVD-ROMs featuring computer software featuring interactive books in the nature of novels; Downloadable podcasts on the topic of fiction; downloadable software in the nature of computer games; software in the nature of computer games; downloadable audiobooks in the nature of fiction; motion pictures and downloadable motion pictures based on novelsACTIVE
028Toys and games, namely, action figures, electronic action toys, plush toys, fantasy character toys, and toy figuresACTIVE
041Ongoing television series based on novels; production of television series and motion pictures; entertainment services, namely, online computer games; on-line journals, namely, blogs in the field of fiction books; production and distribution of motion pictures based on novelsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 22, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 22, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 15, 2013NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED
Jan 15, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 14, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jan 14, 2013DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Dec 7, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Dec 7, 2012DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Dec 7, 2012ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED
Dec 7, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 19, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 18, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jul 13, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jun 19, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 19, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 20, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 25, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Oct 25, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 19, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 16, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 16, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Sep 16, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Sep 16, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Sep 16, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Sep 15, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Sep 15, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 15, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 2, 2011ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Aug 29, 2011PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
Aug 12, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 11, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 19, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 19, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 6, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 21, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 1, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 19, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Nov 18, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 18, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance