Drawing for TASTE THE REAL DIFFERENCE

USPTO serial 85177514

TASTE THE REAL DIFFERENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KAUFMAN, LAURIE R
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TASTE THE REAL DIFFERENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel E. Kattman

DANIEL E KATTMAN REINHART BOERNER VAN DEUREN SC1000 N WATER ST FL 17MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-6648UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029CheeseACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 24, 2012MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Sep 24, 2012ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Sep 24, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Aug 8, 2012EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Feb 28, 2012GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Feb 28, 2012GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Feb 28, 2012CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Feb 8, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 8, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 2, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 20, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Jan 20, 2012EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jan 20, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jan 20, 2012EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jul 20, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jul 20, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 20, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 28, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 27, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 27, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 27, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 19, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 19, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance