USPTO serial 85178520
MULTICARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4358389Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 25, 2013
- Examiner
- BHANOT, KAPIL KUMAR
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MULTICARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic hardware and computer software for creating identification cards, namely, cameras, printers, and control units for creating identification cards; electronic hardware and computer software for operating and controlling and identification, access, tracking and loyalty systems, namely, identification card readers, RFID readers, electronic locks, cameras, and electronic control units for identification, tracking and access; identification smart cards and token devices for access control and tracking, namely, encoded optical, magnetic, electronic and contactless smart cards containing programming used for identification, tracking and access control; RFID tags; electronic security token in the nature of a fob-like device used by an authorized user of a computer system to facilitate authentication | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 20, 2010 |
| 016 | Identification, security and access identification cards not magnetically encoded | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 20, 2010 |
| 045 | Online identification, verification and personalization services for businesses, namely, providing authentication of personal identification information via secure storage and transmitting such information via the Internet; identification and verification services for businesses, namely, providing authentication of personal identification information via token cards, token key fobs, smart cards and non-smart cards | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 20, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rockwest Technology Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Rockwest Technology Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Rockwest Technology Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named MULTICARD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 25, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 24, 2013 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2013 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 21, 2013 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 21, 2013 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 3, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 3, 2013 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 26, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 27, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 1, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 26, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 7, 2011 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 7, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 17, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 1, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |