USPTO serial 85184704
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
County Mayo, IE
County Mayo, IE
County Mayo, IE
County Mayo, IE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LEIGH ANN LINDQUIST
Leigh Ann Lindquist Sughrue Mion, PLLC2000 Pennsylvania Ave. N.W., Suite 9000Washington, DC 20006UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Combination baler/bale wrapper machines for agricultural use; balers for agricultural use; agricultural machinery, namely, bale handlers, bale wrappers; [ and bale splitters; silage handling and working machinery, apparatus, equipment, instruments and implements, namely, tractor-towed agricultural instruments in the nature of silage forks, silage cutters and silage grabs; fodder and bedding handling, shredding, ] wrapping machinery, apparatus, equipment, instruments and implements, namely, [ fodder mixing machines, fodder presses, shredding machines and ] wrapping machines; agricultural materials handling, compacting, wrapping and disposal machinery, apparatus, equipment, instruments and implements, namely, [ tractor pulled rakes, tedders, shear grabs, ] hay balers [, threshers, windrowers and fertilizer spreaders; and component parts and fittings for all the aforesaid agricultural machinery ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | [ Agricultural hand tools, instruments and implements, namely, splitters and pullers, scrapers, picks, augers, rammers, gimlets, reamers, gouges, holing axes, milling cutters, hand-operated sharpening tools and instruments ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2023 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2023 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 19, 2023 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 19, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 20, 2023 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2020 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2020 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 12, 2020 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 12, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 30, 2020 | NCS8 | NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SEC. 8 EMAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 28, 2020 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2020 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Mar 28, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 12, 2020 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 2, 2013 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 2, 2013 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 27, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 26, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 9, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |