USPTO serial 85185695
CASA DI BOSA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 7, 2021
- Examiner
- LAVACHE, LINDA M
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with CASA DI BOSA?
CopyMark Law Group can help you respond to USPTO correspondence, keep a registration alive, or watch new filings against your mark.
Owner
A. Bosa & Co. Ltd.
Vancouver, BC, CA
A. Bosa & Co. Ltd.
Vancouver, BC, CA
A. Bosa & Co. Ltd.
Vancouver, BC, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | Household goods, namely, candles | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Household goods, namely, cutlery, namely, knives, spoons, forks; household goods, namely, cutters for wine bottle foil | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Household goods, namely, paper coasters, paper napkins, textile wine gift bags, posters, paintings, paper tablecloths, decorative textile wine bags for gift wrapping wine bottles | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Household goods, namely, candle holders, coasters made of plastic, non-electric wall sconces; household goods, namely, dishes, namely, bowls, plates, cups, serving trays, salt and pepper mills and shakers, coffee mugs, drinking glasses; household glassware, namely, wine glasses, goblets, decanters, pitchers, carafes; wine making equipment and household wine accessories, namely, bottle openers, hand-operated wine aerators, decorative wine bottle collars made of foil specially adapted for use around the top of wine bottles to stop drips, wine bottle holders and cradles made of wood and plastic, coolers for wine, bottle stoppers for wine, wine openers, wine bottle cradles, wine drip collars specifically adapted to collect drips when pouring wine | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Household goods, namely, bed blankets, cloth face towels, bath towels, dishcloths, washcloths, tablecloths not of paper | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Food products, namely, cooking oil, edible oil, salad oil, vegetable oil, tomato paste, antipasto, soups, cheeses, processed fish for food purposes, processed anchovies, packaged deli meats; processed and preserved fruits and vegetables, namely, pimentos, olives, dried figs, tomatoes, sun dried tomatoes, pickled vegetables, mixed vegetables, artichokes, peppers, mushrooms; processed beans, potato-based gnocchi | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Vinegar, egg noodles, pasta, lasagna, flour-based gnocchi, pasta sauces, tomato sauces, capers, rice, coffees, cornmeal, biscuits, bread sticks; baking products, namely, Italian specialty yeasts and food flavourings, being non-essential oils; confectioneries, namely, candies and chocolates; spices | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Non-alcoholic beverages, namely, fruit nectars, fruit juices and mineral water | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | Wine; wine making kits for the purpose of making homemade wine comprised of grape juice, oak chips, aging enhancers and wine preservatives | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services featuring food products, household goods, housewares, wine and wine making equipment | ACTIVE | — |
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2021 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 29, 2021 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 21, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2021 | PG1B | PETITION GRANTED - REQUEST TO DELETE 1(B) FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2021 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 11, 2021 | EPGS | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE AND REQUEST TO DELETE 1B OR G/S | — |
| Aug 23, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 23, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 19, 2021 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jul 12, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2021 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2021 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2021 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 15, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2020 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2020 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 7, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2020 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jul 7, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 7, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 19, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2019 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 15, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 6, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 17, 2018 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 22, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 2, 2018 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 16, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 11, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 10, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 29, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2017 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 15, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 17, 2015 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 17, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 6, 2014 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 11, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 6, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 10, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 16, 2011 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 7, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |