USPTO serial 85189722
FIND FIRST IN NEW DESIGN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FIND FIRST IN NEW DESIGN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rocky Mount, VA
Rocky Mount, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gilbert J. Andia, Jr.
GILBERT J. ANDIA, JR. HIGGINS BENJAMIN EAGLES & ADAMS, PLLC101 W FRIENDLY AVESTE 500GREENSBORO, NC 27401-2521Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Sculptures of metal; wall sculptures of metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Lamps, table lamps; floor lamps; desk lamps; accent lamps; buffet lamps; electric lighting fixtures; electric lighting fixtures, namely, sconces; lighting fixtures; chandeliers | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Clocks; table clocks; wall clocks | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Framed art pictures; printed art reproductions; easels; bookends; chalk and chalkboards; art prints | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Ceramic sculptures, vases, vessels, bowls, plates and pots; glass bowls; urns; candle holders; ceramic figurines | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | Artificial plants; artificial flower arrangements; artificial flower arrangements in containers; artificial trees; and artificial topiaries | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Uttermost Co.
- Other trademarks owned by The Uttermost Co.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Similar marks named FIND FIRST IN NEW DESIGN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 5, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 14, 2013 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2013 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 8, 2013 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2013 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 23, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 28, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 6, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 4, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 9, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 5, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 4, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 7, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 4, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 9, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 1, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 30, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |