Drawing for RIFT

USPTO serial 85192454

RIFT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DALIER, JOHN DAVID
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RIFT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Perry J. Viscounty

PERRY J. VISCOUNTY LATHAM & WATKINS LLP650 TOWN CENTER DR STE 2000COSTA MESA, CA 92626-7135UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Publications, namely, a series of books providing maps, hints, tips, strategies, instructions, reviews, and other information relating to computer games, video games, electronic games, board games and other games; paper goods, namely, trading cards, coloring books, adhesive stickers, rub-on transfers, notebooks and stationery-type portfolios; greeting cards, calendars; advertisement boards of paper or cardboard, pictures, catalogues featuring computer game merchandise, photographs and printsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 30, 2019ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Dec 29, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 29, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 13, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
May 12, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
May 7, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
May 7, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 26, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Nov 25, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Nov 21, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Nov 21, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 21, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
May 20, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
May 10, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
May 10, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 21, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Nov 20, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Nov 15, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Nov 15, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 17, 2012NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED
Jul 16, 2012DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jun 29, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 7, 2012INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST
Jun 6, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
May 22, 2012DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
May 22, 2012ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED
May 22, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
May 18, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
May 18, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
May 18, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 16, 2012CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
May 16, 2012COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Nov 22, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 27, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Sep 27, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 22, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 18, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 8, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 5, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 4, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 4, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 4, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 10, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Dec 10, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance