USPTO serial 85193250
TOASTMASTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HWANG, JOHN C B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TOASTMASTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William H. Brewster
WILLIAM H. BREWSTER KILPATRICK STOCKTON LLP1100 PEACHTREE ST NESTE 2800ATLANTA, GA 30309-4530Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Kitchen knives; kitchen tools for domestic or household use, namely, kitchen cutlery, non-electric can openers, non-electric fruit and vegetable peelers, pizza cutters, egg slicers, cheese planes, nutcrackers | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 009 | Kitchen tools for domestic or household use, namely, measuring spoons, meat thermometers, mechanical food timers, electric food timers, measuring cups | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 011 | Electric tea kettles; electric hot pots | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 021 | Cookware for domestic or household use, namely, pots and pans, non-electric tea kettles, non-electric hot pots; bakeware for domestic or household use, namely, baking sheets and baking pans; kitchen tools for domestic or household use, namely, whisks, bottle openers, jar openers, potato mashers, colanders, food basters, garlic presses, kitchen tongs, slotted spoons, turners, graters, metal strainers, corn cob holders, ice cream scoops, cookie cutters, bamboo cooking skewers, flour sifters, cutting boards, dish drying racks, ice cube molds, serving trays, fruit and salad bowls, pitchers, food carriers, cutlery caddies, dish drainers and dish trays; utensils for barbecues, namely, forks, tongs, turners; plastic bowls, cups, and containers for the storage of food; dinnerware, namely, plates, bowls, cups, saucers, serving trays; beverageware; glass beverageware | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Applica Consumer Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named TOASTMASTER
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 23, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 27, 2012 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |