Drawing for SILVER WEAR

USPTO serial 85197639

SILVER WEAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SHINER, MARK W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SILVER WEAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles Vorndran

CHARLES VORNDRAN PABST PATENT GROUP LLP1545 PEACHTREE ST NE STE 320ATLANTA, GA 30309-2492UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Therapeutic covering, wound covering, and conductive wound covering, all of which contain silver, namely, adhesive bandages, bandages for skin wounds, surgical bandages, burn dressings and medical dressingsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 23, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 23, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 6, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Aug 5, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Aug 4, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Aug 4, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 19, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Feb 18, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Feb 17, 2014NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED
Feb 17, 2014TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION
Feb 17, 2014PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Feb 17, 2014PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Feb 14, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Sep 12, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Sep 11, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Aug 27, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED
Aug 27, 2013TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION
Aug 27, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Aug 27, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Aug 14, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Feb 14, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Feb 13, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Feb 12, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Feb 12, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 3, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 2, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 29, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jun 8, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 8, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 14, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 20, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Dec 20, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 30, 2011NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Nov 14, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 14, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 20, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 20, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Oct 20, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Oct 20, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Oct 20, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Oct 19, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 19, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 19, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 19, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 18, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Dec 17, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance