Drawing for IGO

USPTO serial 85197818

IGO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BUSH, KAREN K
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IGO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

R. Lee Fraley

R. LEE FRALEY SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.400 E VAN BURENPHOENIX, AZ 85004-2202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Wireless electronics docking stations, namely, car, home and portable mounting kits for use with electronic mobile devices; phone and digital music player docksACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 24, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 24, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 14, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED
Nov 14, 2012NOACCORRECTED NOA MAILED
Nov 13, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Nov 13, 2012DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Nov 2, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Nov 2, 2012DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Nov 2, 2012ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED
Nov 2, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 14, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED
Jun 13, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 13, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
May 21, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
May 21, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 22, 2011NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 27, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 7, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 23, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 22, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 9, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 3, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 2, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 2, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 2, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 21, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Dec 18, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Dec 17, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance