USPTO serial 85200064
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Benjamin D. Tietgen, Etherton Law Group, LLC
BENJAMIN D. TIETGEN, ETHERTON LAW GROUP, LLC ETHERTON LAW GROUP, LLC2010 E UNIVERSITY DR STE 25TEMPE, AZ 85281-4683UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Credit card registration services; credit card cancellation services; monitoring consumer credit information and providing alerts to changes therein; referral of victims of credit fraud to law enforcement and regulatory agencies; referrals in the field of insurance against consumer and credit fraud; product marketing services for businesses; consulting services in the field of product marketing | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Credit and financial consultation; consulting in the field of insurance against consumer and credit fraud; evaluation of credit bureau data; financial services, namely, credit repair and restoration; document preparation specifically for preventing and assisting with repairing and preventing damage caused by loss or compromise of identification information and damage to credit status | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Consulting and advocacy services in the fields of credit fraud prevention and credit repair and restoration; consulting services in the fields of internet and e-mail security and fraud prevention; fraud and identity theft prevention services; consultation in the field of data theft and identity theft; monitoring of credit reports, the Internet, and public records to facilitate the detection and prevention of identity theft and fraud; providing assistance to consumers in notification of relevant institutions, businesses, and agencies in the event of a loss or compromise of identification or lost or stolen credit cards, drivers' licenses, passports, airline tickets and other personal-identity data or documents; providing identity theft and fraud prevention services to businesses for use by their customers; data protection services; providing consulting, assessment, and repair services in the fields of data protection and data breach response | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 21, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 21, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 24, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |