USPTO serial 85202251
SEEDLING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWERS, ALEXANDER L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SEEDLING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Whitford, Auckland, NZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark D. Giarratana, Esquire
MARK D GIARRATANA MCCARTER & ENGLISH LLP185 ASYLUM STCITYPLACE IHARTFORD, CT 06103-3408Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Modeling clay and compounds for children, sold as a unit; arts and craft clay kits; children's arts and crafts paper kits | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Board games; toy building blocks; building games; playing cards; puzzles; educational teaching and playing games, namely, card games and games machines; hobby craft sets for making beads and crystals; electronic action toys; toys in the form of drawing apparatus for children; toy model hobbycraft kits; electronic educational teaching games; electronic educational teaching games for children; tactile educational games, namely, educational games designed to teach reading, writing, mathematical, musical, artistic, and scientific principles and skills to children; hobby craft sets for making decorative objects with magnets; hobby craft sets for making model buildings; hobby craft sets for making sand art; hobby craft sets for making soap; hobby craft sets for cooking and sushi making, and molding chocolate; hobby craft sets for gardening and carpentry; hobby craft sets for fashion design, cosmetics and skin care; none of the foregoing being dolls or accessories thereof | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2014 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 8, 2014 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 8, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 22, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 3, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 2, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |