USPTO serial 85202541
TD'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOSID, ROBIN S
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TD'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Prepared, packaged, fresh and frozen entrees consisting primarily of one or more of meat, fish, poultry, fruit, and vegetables; soup, chowder and chili; cheese, cheese spreads; pickles; salads, namely, fruit salads, vegetable salads, fruit and vegetable salads; salads consisting primarily of vegetables including one or more of egg, meat, fish, poultry and cheese; side dishes, namely, potato salad, coleslaw, egg salad, chicken salad, and pepperoni cups; processed fruit, processed fruit in-a-cup, yogurt, yogurt cups, processed fruit and yogurt cups; snack food, namely, potato chips and processed nuts; omelets; prepared and prepackaged meals and entries consisting primarily of egg with one or more of meat, fish, poultry, vegetable, and cheese; platters consisting primarily of deli meats including one or more of cheese, fresh fruit, vegetables, and pickled vegetables; snack mix consisting primarily of processed fruits, dehydrated fruits, processed nuts, processed seeds and/or raisins | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1986 |
| 030 | Sandwiches, namely, burger sandwiches, submarine sandwiches, wrap sandwiches, deli sandwiches, pita sandwiches, bagel sandwiches, egg sandwiches, breakfast sandwiches, breakfast burritos; pre-packaged sandwiches and wrap sandwiches; prepared, packaged, fresh and frozen entrees consisting primarily of pasta or rice; bakery products; side dishes, namely, pasta salad, rice salad, macaroni salad; snack food, namely, cheese crisps, corn chips, pita chips, crackers, popcorn, granola and snack mix consisting primarily of crackers, pretzels, cereal and/or popped popcorn; desserts, namely, bakery desserts, pies, cakes, cookies, brownies, dessert mousse, dessert pudding, ice cream desserts; condiments, namely, ketchup, mustard, relish, chutney, salsa, mayonnaise, hot sauce; pizza | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1986 |
| 031 | Fresh fruit | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1986 |
| 035 | Retail delicatessen services; restaurant franchising services, namely, offering business management assistance in the establishment and/or operation of delis within retail convenience stores featuring prepared, packaged, fresh and frozen entrees, delicatessen-style food, side dishes, snacks, and desserts | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Tedeschi Food Shops, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Tedeschi Food Shops, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named TD'S
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 21, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2012 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 16, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 21, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 13, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 13, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 23, 2011 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 23, 2011 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 23, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 21, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 24, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |