USPTO serial 85203627
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software to enable access to online social networking; Computer application software for mobile devices, internet browsers, set-top boxes, electronic readers, and tablet computers, namely, software for video games; Computer-software development tools | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 30, 2012 |
| 035 | Retail store services featuring electronic games, computer games, video games, electronic game software, computer game software, and video game software; Online retail store services featuring streaming and downloadable pre-recorded electronic games; Advertising services, namely, dissemination of advertising for others via an on-line electronic communications network and providing an on-line commercial information directory for electronic game enthusiasts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 30, 2012 |
| 038 | Providing online chat rooms and electronic bulletin boards; Providing online forums for communication in the field of electronic games; Streaming of audio, video, and audiovisual content, data and information on the Internet; Streaming of electronic games via the Internet; Providing video on-demand transmission of computer games | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 30, 2012 |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing online computer games; Entertainment services, namely, providing online electronic games; Entertainment services, namely, providing online video games; Electronic games services provided by means of the internet; Production of video and computer game software; Providing a computer game for use network-wide by network users; Providing a web-based system and on-line portal for customers to participate in on-line gaming, operation and coordination of game tournaments, leagues and tours; Providing information on-line relating to computer games and computer enhancements for games; Rental of computer game programs; Rental of computer game software; Rental of video games; Providing online computer games and real-time listing of scores and ranking of players in connection therewith; Providing on-line computer games and multi-player matching services in connection therewith; Providing on-line entertainment in the nature of computer game competitions and tournaments; Providing online game services in the nature of multi-player interactive matching services, namely, the matching of players of software games; Providing an interactive website featuring non-downloadable video games and facilitating player competition and interaction; Online journals, namely, blogs in the field of electronic games; Organizing computer and video game competitions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 30, 2012 |
| 042 | Design and development of computer game software; video and computer game design and development services; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software development tools in the field of electronic games; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software applications for social networking, creating a virtual community and transmission of audio, video, photographic images, text, graphics and data in the field of electronic games; Video game development services; Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer game software problems; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for use in relation to visual images, including digital animation and special effects of images, video games, and motion pictures; Application service provider (ASP) featuring application programming interface (API) software including such software for the streaming, storage, and sharing of video games, content, data and information | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 30, 2012 |
| 045 | Social networking services provided online and through wireless networks; Providing a website on the internet for the purpose of social networking | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 30, 2012 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 16, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2020 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 15, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 7, 2015 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 9, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 30, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2014 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 9, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 18, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 6, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 1, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 1, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 10, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 15, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 25, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 21, 2011 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 21, 2011 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 21, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 22, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 23, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 1, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 25, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |