USPTO serial 85203650
YVES ROCHER HYDRA PERFORMANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FENNESSY, EDWARD JOHN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with YVES ROCHER HYDRA PERFORMANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | NON-MEDICATED COSMETIC SKIN, FACE, AND BODY CARE PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, CREAMS AND LOTIONS FOR THE SKIN, FACE AND BODY; NON MEDICATED SKIN-CARE PREPARATIONS FOR MOISTURIZING, CLEANSING, VITALIZING, PURIFYING AND IMPROVING THE APPEARANCE OF THE BODY AND THE FACE; NON-MEDICATED BEAUTY CREAMS FOR THE BODY, FACE OR SKIN; LOTIONS FOR THE BODY, FACE OR SKIN; COSMETIC MILKS; SKIN TONERS; NON-MEDICATED SKIN, BODY, AND FACIAL CARE PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, GELS FOR THE SKIN, FACE AND BODY; EMULSIONS FOR THE BODY, FACE OR SKIN; BATH FOAMS; BODY MASKS; FACIAL MASKS; SKIN MASKS; BODY SCRUBS; FACIAL SCRUBS; SKIN SCRUBS, NAMELY, HAND SCRUBS, FOOT SCRUBS; NON-MEDICATED ANTI-WRINKLE CREAMS; NON-MEDICATED ANTI-BLEMISH CREAMS, NAMELY, COSMETIC FOUNDATION AND COSMETIC POWDERS, CREAMS, LOTIONS, GELS, PRE-MOISTENED COSMETIC WIPES AND REFRESHING NON-MEDICATED DISPOSABLE SKIN CLEANSING, WIPES AND PATCHES CONTAINING CELLULITE REDUCTION CREAMS, LOTIONS AND GELS; ANTI-AGING CLEANERS; ANTI-AGING CREAM; PRE-MOISTENED COSMETIC WIPES FOR HANDS; HAND SPRAY, NAMELY, HAND SANITIZING SPRAY; FOOT DEODORANT SPRAY; HAND AND FOOT SCRUBS; HAND AND FOOT GELS FOR MOISTURIZING, CLEANSING, VITALIZING, PURIFYING AND IMPROVING TEH APPEARANCE OF THE HANDS AND FEET; HAND CREAMS; NON-MEDICATED FOOT CREAM; BODY OILS FOR THE HANDS AND FEET; BODY MILKS FOR THE HANDS AND FEET; NON-MEDICATED HAND AND FOOT BALMS; HAND LOTION; NON-MEDICATED FOOT LOTION; SUN TANNING PREPARATIONS; COSMETIC SUNSCREEN PREPARATIONS; SUNSCREEN CREAMS; COSMETIC SUNTAN PREPARATIONS; COSMETIC FOUNDATIONS; COSMETIC WHITE FACE POWDER; SOLID POWDER FOR COMPACTS; MINERAL POWDER FOR USE IN COSMETIC BODY WRAP APPLICATIONS; ALL NON-MEDICATED | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 4, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 5, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 5, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 19, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 25, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 1, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 25, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |