Drawing for ABSOLUT COUNTRY OF SWEDEN ELYX ALWAYS PRODUCED & BOTTLED IN AHUS SWEDEN THE SILKY TEXTURE AND ELEGANT TASTE OF THIS OUTSTANDING VODKA IS THE RESULT OF SWEDISH CRAFTSMANSHIP HAND SELECTED GRAINS AND IDEAL AMOUNTS OF COPPER FOR CATALYZATION IN DISTILLATION.

USPTO serial 85204744

ABSOLUT COUNTRY OF SWEDEN ELYX ALWAYS PRODUCED & BOTTLED IN AHUS SWEDEN THE SILKY TEXTURE AND ELEGANT TASTE OF THIS OUTSTANDING VODKA IS THE RESULT OF SWEDISH CRAFTSMANSHIP HAND SELECTED GRAINS AND IDEAL AMOUNTS OF COPPER FOR CATALYZATION IN DISTILLATION.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ABSOLUT COUNTRY OF SWEDEN ELYX ALWAYS PRODUCED & BOTTLED IN AHUS SWEDEN THE SILKY TEXTURE AND ELEGANT TASTE OF THIS OUTSTANDING VODKA IS THE RESULT OF SWEDISH CRAFTSMANSHIP HAND SELECTED GRAINS AND IDEAL AMOUNTS OF COPPER FOR CATALYZATION IN DISTILLATION.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard Y. Kim

RICHARD Y. KIM MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP500 NORTH CAPITOL STREET, NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-1531UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages, namely, vodka and other distilled spiritsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 19, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 19, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 25, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 24, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jan 24, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jan 9, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jan 9, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 9, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 17, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 22, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
May 22, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 2, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Apr 16, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 4, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 4, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 4, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 23, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 13, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 25, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Sep 23, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 20, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 20, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 22, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 4, 2011MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Jan 3, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Dec 27, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance