USPTO serial 85205031
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | business consultation; business management consulting; business marketing consulting services; business planning; business process re-engineering services; computerized database management; computerized word processing services; customer services, namely, responding to customers inquiries for others in the field of video gaming and video game testing; data processing services; business enterprise consulting, namely, consulting to the video game industry on business process improvement and enterprise design architecture; management of telephone call centers for others; market research and surveys; operation of telephone call centers for others; operation of telephone communication centers for others; employment staffing in the video gaming software field; outsourcing services for others in the fields of network management and communication products and systems | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Computer aided design drafting; computer code conversion for others; computer consultation; computer disaster recovery planning; computer hardware development; computer network and software design for others; computer programming for others; computer project management services; computer software development; computer systems analysis; consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; troubleshooting of computer software problems; technical support services, namely, 24/7 monitoring of network systems, servers and web and database applications and notification of related events and alerts; data conversion of computer programs and data from visual media to CD-ROM and other digital formats; data warehousing; database development services; design and testing for new product development; design and testing of new products for others; design services for others in the field of computer networks and systems; computer code conversion for others; data conversion of computer programs and data, not physical conversion; duplication of computer programs; computer technology support services, namely, help desk services; planning, design and management of information technology systems; integration of computer communication systems and networks; media duplication of data and digital information onto cd-roms and other digital media and digital storage devices; monitoring the computer systems of others for technological purposes and providing back-up computer programs and facilities; on-line batch computer services, namely, configuration of multiple files into a single group; graphic art design; product development consultation; product research and development; product safety testing; computer project management services; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for use in database management; quality assurance services for others in the field of computer hardware and software; records automation, namely, electronic digitizing of printed records into a computer readable medium; recovery of computer data; repair of computer software; electronic storage services for archiving databases, images and other electronic data; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer hardware and software problems; technical consultation and research in the field computer software/firmware, engineering, information technology, and science; technology supervision and inspection in the field of quality control of products, namely, computer software and hardware; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems; technical writing for others; testing, analysis and evaluation of the goods and services of others for the purpose of certification; product testing, namely, video game testing, video game quality assurance testing and video game verification testing; writing technical communications and documentation for video game publishers; consulting services in the field of computer software, namely, software evaluation, testing and verification | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2017 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 11, 2016 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 26, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 7, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 7, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 14, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 21, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 25, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 29, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 23, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 23, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |