USPTO serial 85208522
WE BELIEVE IN THE POWER OF NATURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JACKSON, WILLIAM D
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WE BELIEVE IN THE POWER OF NATURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Turbines and generators of electric energy; hydromechanical equipment for power plants, namely, equipment for conducting, controlling and regulating water flow within hydroelectric power plants and waterways in the nature of pumps, pump control valves, flowgates, trash racks, stoplogs and penstocks; cranes; wind-driven generators for producing electricity; electromechanical equipment for power plants, namely, hydraulic turbines, transformers; electromechanical equipment for wind power plants, namely, wind generators; electromechanical equipment for nuclear power plants, namely, vapor turbines; pumping equipment, namely, pump turbines for pump storage power stations | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Speed governors for machines, namely, electronic speed controllers and power-frequency governors for prime movers used for power generation; excitation system comprised of static exciters; automatic voltage regulators; electromechanical equipment for wind power plants, namely, main grids and grid stations for production and distribution of electricity; machines for control, supervision, monitoring and protection of hydroelectric, wind and nuclear powerplants, namely, transformers, turbine and generator switches, auxiliary power supplies, emergency power supplies, voltage switchgears, electrical motor controllers, electrical grounding devices, temperature sensors, voltage sensors, vibration sensors, discharge sensors, hydroelectric dam water level monitors, alarm installations and alarms, circuit breakers and electrical transducers, main grids and grid stations for production and distribution of electricity; wind generator farm electric systems and subsystems comprised of wind turbine towers, turbine and generator switches, voltage regulators, transformers and wind turbine controllers, auxiliary power supplies, emergency power supplies, voltage switchgears, electrical grounding devices, temperature sensors, voltage sensors, vibration sensors, discharge sensors, alarm installations and alarms, circuit breakers and electrical transducers | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Electromechanical equipment for nuclear power plants, namely, nuclear reactors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Industrias Metalurgicas Pescarmona S.A.I.C. Y F.
- Other trademarks owned by Industrias Metalurgicas Pescarmona S.A.I.C. Y F.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named WE BELIEVE IN THE POWER OF NATURE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 16, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 5, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 16, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 13, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 18, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 29, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 21, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 21, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 16, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 1, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 1, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |