Drawing for NORTEX

USPTO serial 85210841

NORTEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KHAN, ASMAT A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with NORTEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles M. Marmelstein

CHARLES M. MARMELSTEIN ARENT FOX LLP1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NW STE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5369UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Protective, safety and sport helmets; protective, safety and sport gogglesACTIVE
018Tote bags; backpacks; luggageACTIVE
025Clothing and accessories, namely, jackets, parkas, bomber jackets, pants, duffle coats, leggings, leg warmers, ski suits, ski jackets, ski pants, snowmobile suits, snowmobile jackets, snowmobile pants, snow suits, snow jackets, snow pants, vests, tops, wetsuits, coats, raincoats, rain jackets, ponchos, shirts, blouses, turtlenecks, tops, shorts, skirts, jumpers, capes, scarves, shawls, foulards, T-shirts, sweatshirts, sweat pants, jeans, robes, leotards, leggings, tights, bodysuits, culottes, gloves, mitts, hats, caps, tuques, bonnets, head bands, neck warmers, boots, socks, swimwear, underwear, belts for clothingACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 6, 2015UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
Jan 29, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 28, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 2, 2014CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Jul 2, 2014CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Jun 30, 2014RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Dec 24, 2013CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Dec 23, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Dec 23, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 23, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 16, 2013ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Jun 27, 2013CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Jun 26, 2013CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Mar 28, 2013RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Sep 21, 2012CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Sep 20, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Sep 20, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 20, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 11, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 10, 2012ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Mar 12, 2012CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Mar 11, 2012CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Sep 9, 2011CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Sep 8, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Sep 8, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Sep 7, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Sep 7, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Aug 30, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 30, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 24, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 15, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 30, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 10, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jan 8, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance