USPTO serial 85210841
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles M. Marmelstein
CHARLES M. MARMELSTEIN ARENT FOX LLP1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NW STE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5369UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Protective, safety and sport helmets; protective, safety and sport goggles | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Tote bags; backpacks; luggage | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing and accessories, namely, jackets, parkas, bomber jackets, pants, duffle coats, leggings, leg warmers, ski suits, ski jackets, ski pants, snowmobile suits, snowmobile jackets, snowmobile pants, snow suits, snow jackets, snow pants, vests, tops, wetsuits, coats, raincoats, rain jackets, ponchos, shirts, blouses, turtlenecks, tops, shorts, skirts, jumpers, capes, scarves, shawls, foulards, T-shirts, sweatshirts, sweat pants, jeans, robes, leotards, leggings, tights, bodysuits, culottes, gloves, mitts, hats, caps, tuques, bonnets, head bands, neck warmers, boots, socks, swimwear, underwear, belts for clothing | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2015 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 28, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 2, 2014 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 24, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 23, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2013 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 15, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 30, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |