Drawing for THE LAST RESORT

USPTO serial 85210859

THE LAST RESORT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
PARKER, JUSTINE D
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE LAST RESORT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert D. Katz, Esq.

ROBERT D KATZ EATON & VAN WINKLE LLP3 PARK AVENUE16TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10016

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Hotel and restaurant services; Providing hotel accommodation; Resort hotelsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 10, 2012MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Oct 1, 2012ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Oct 1, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Aug 16, 2012EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
May 16, 2012GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
May 16, 2012GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
May 16, 2012CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
May 10, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 10, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 3, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 26, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 26, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Apr 26, 2012EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Apr 26, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Apr 26, 2012EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jan 27, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 26, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 26, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Oct 26, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 26, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 4, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 4, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 4, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 29, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 4, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 10, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jan 8, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance