Drawing for VIA SOLUTIONS

USPTO serial 85214588

VIA SOLUTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CHOSID, ROBIN S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIA SOLUTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Denise I. Mroz

DENISE I. MROZ WOODCOCK WASHBURN LLPCIRA CENTRE 12TH FL2929 ARCH STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19104-2891

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Fixation implants comprised of allograft or bone void fillers consisting of biological materialsACTIVE
010Surgical instruments for use in spine surgery to access the body; medical and surgical implants and instruments comprised of metal or synthetic materials, namely, screws, connecting rods, intervertebral spacers, vertebral body replacements, interbody fusion implants and related insertion instruments used in spinal surgery; surgical instruments for use in the augmentation of bone and tissue; surgical instruments for use in the fixation of bone and tissue; fixation implants comprised of metal or synthetic materialACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 18, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 18, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 27, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Aug 10, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Aug 8, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Aug 8, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Aug 8, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 12, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 10, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jan 10, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jan 10, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 16, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 21, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jun 21, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 13, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 13, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 28, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 26, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Apr 26, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Apr 26, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Apr 26, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Apr 25, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 7, 2011GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 7, 2011GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 7, 2011CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 31, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 14, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jan 14, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance