Drawing for THINK BALD!

USPTO serial 85225863

THINK BALD!

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RAPPAPORT, SETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THINK BALD!?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brendan M. Shortell

BRENDAN M. SHORTELL LAMBERT & ASSOCIATES92 STATE ST STE 200BOSTON, MA 02109-2004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Hair removing cream, shaving balm, Shaving creams, Shaving gels, Shaving lotion, Wax for removing body hair, and Shaving preparationsACTIVE
008razor blades, electronic razors and straight razorsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 16, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 16, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 13, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 19, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jul 19, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 14, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 13, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 13, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jun 13, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jun 13, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jun 13, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jun 13, 2011ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
May 31, 2011PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
May 16, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 14, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 28, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 27, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 27, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 27, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 20, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 1, 2011MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Jan 29, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jan 28, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance