Drawing for EMEDMART BY EGSAMART

USPTO serial 85228130

EMEDMART BY EGSAMART

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HSU, FONG
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EMEDMART BY EGSAMART?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jay Begler

JAY BEGLER NIESAR & VESTAL LLP90 NEW MONTGOMERY ST9TH FLOORSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-4504

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035on-line retail store services in the field of medical equipmentACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 4, 2013MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jan 17, 2013ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jan 17, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Dec 17, 2012CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Dec 17, 2012COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Dec 3, 2012EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Jul 12, 2012GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Jul 12, 2012GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Jul 12, 2012CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
May 30, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 30, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 24, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 14, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
May 14, 2012EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
May 14, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
May 14, 2012EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Nov 14, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Nov 14, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 14, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 24, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 24, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 24, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 3, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 2, 2011MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Feb 1, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jan 31, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance