USPTO serial 85230565
OMIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TIERNEY, MARGERY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OMIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Laguna Beach, CA
Laguna Beach, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jody H. Drake
Jody H. Drake Sughrue Mion, PLLC2100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NWSuite 800Washington, DC 20037-3202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electric, photographic, cinematographic, optical, apparatus and instruments, namely, electronic, photograph, cinematographic, optical, apparatus and instruments, namely, eyeglasses, sunglasses, cases and parts for eyeglasses and sunglasses, snow goggles, goggles for sports; DVD's featuring skateboarding, music, and youth lifestyle, headphones, earphones, cell phone cases, protective sleeves for laptop computers | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Goods of precious metals and their alloys or coated therewith, namely, pendants, ornamental pins, costume jewelry, key chains, all made of precious metal; watches | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Goods made from leather and imitations of leather, namely, coin purses, credit card cases, bags, namely, all purpose bags, carrying bags. athletic bags, book bags, sports bags, travel bags, duffel bags, messenger bags, tote bags, and backpacks, fanny packs, ruck sacks, hip sacks, imitation leather key chains, key wallets and key cases, knapsacks, suitcases, leather cases, wallets, leather pouches, luggage and trunks, luggage tags, pocket books, pouches and bags sold empty for attachment to backpacks, pouches for holding keys, vanity cases sold empty; non-leather goods, namely, coin purses, credit card cases, bags, fanny packs, ruck sacks, hip sacks, key wallets and key cases, knapsacks, suitcases, wallets, pouches, luggage and trunks, luggage tags, pocket books, pouches and bags sold empty for attachment to backpacks, pouches for holding keys, vanity cases sold empty; mesh shopping bags; umbrellas and parts therefor | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Sporting equipment, namely, skateboards; skateboard components, namely, griptape, decks, trucks, bearings, bolts and wheels | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Online retail store services and retail store service featuring the sale of clothing, footwear, headwear, bags, luggage, eyeglasses and sunglasses, watches, ornamental pins, jewelry, skateboards and skateboard components | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Omit, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Omit, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named OMIT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 13, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 15, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2014 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 12, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 27, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 11, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 17, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 29, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 23, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 3, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 3, 2011 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 3, 2011 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 3, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 27, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 20, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |