USPTO serial 85246057
GO DENTAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TRIPI, CYNTHIA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GO DENTAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David N. Preece
DAVID N. PREECE CLAYTON, HOWARTH & CANNON, P.C.PO BOX 1909SANDY, UT 84091-1909UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Toothbrushes; Electric toothbrushes; Dental floss; Hand-held dental mirror; Dental scaler; Tongue cleaners; Dental care kit comprising toothbrushes and floss; Dental floss dispensers; Dental tape; Toothbrush cases and holders; Cups, not of precious metal; Glass cups; Plastic cups; Mugs, not of precious metal; Coffee cups, not of precious metal; and Toothbrush cup; Chapstick | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 21, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 25, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2011 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| May 11, 2011 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |