USPTO serial 85263493
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William C. Wright
William C. Wright Epstein Drangel LLP60 East 42nd Street, Suite 1250New York, NY 10165UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | (Based on Use in Commerce) [ Prepared vegetables; processed vegetables; ] preserved and processed peas; mushy peas in the nature of processed cooked peas; [ canned vegetables ] (Based on 44(e)) [ Meat extracts ] [ ; prepared meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; ] [ edible oils and edible fats; ] [ processed potatoes; ] [ potato products, namely, potato chips, potato pudding, potato salad and potato-based snack foods; bouillon, bouillon concentrates; broth, broth concentrates; ] [ soups; ] [ jellies; baked beans; canned or dried pulses; canned pulses; dried pulses; frozen vegetables and fruit; prepared fruit in the nature of preserved, dried and cooked fruit; ] [ processed fruit in the nature of preserved, dried and cooked fruit; ] [ canned fruit; ] processed, canned foods, namely, peas, beans [, butterbeans, beetroot, carrots, prunes, plums, loganberries, blackberries, strawberries, raspberries, cherries, gooseberries, figs and fruit salad; ] [ processed dried peas, beans, onions, potatoes, carrots, mixed vegetables and apples; prepared canned or soup mixes containing meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; canned sweet corn; none of the above being beef jerky ] | ACTIVE | Jul 10, 2003 |
| 030 | (Based on 44(e)) [ Rice, spaghetti; pasta; ] [ pasta products, namely, ravioli; ] [ noodles; dried noodles; ] [ cereal-based snack foods; ] prepared meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; [ bakery desserts; ] [ sauces and spices; ] [ coffee essences for foodstuffs; food flavorings; curry; gravy powder mixes; custard powder mixes; caramel powder mixes; ] [ prepared dehydrated meals consisting of pasta or rice ] [ ; roasted sweet corn; potato products, namely, potato flour; gravies; aromatic preparations for food, namely, cinnamon spice, cloves, curry spice and ginger ] | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2023 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2023 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 7, 2023 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 7, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 17, 2022 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2021 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Dec 1, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 1, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 19, 2018 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 20, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 31, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 4, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 4, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 5, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 11, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 20, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |