Drawing for COOKIE

USPTO serial 85268440

COOKIE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
VENGROFF, MARILYN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COOKIE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric E. Gisolfi

Eric E. Gisolfi SABIN, BERMANT & GOULD LLPOne World Trade CenterNEW YORK, NY 10007-2915UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software applications for use in connection with smartphones, pda devices, tablet computers and portable and handheld digital electronic devices, namely, software for accessing, viewing, interacting with and downloading content and information from websites and magazines in the fields of fashion, style and culture for parents and childrenACTIVE
016Stationery, namely, scrapbooks, invitations, note cards, notepads, paper napkins and party decorations; arts and craft paint kitsACTIVE
028Toys and games, namely, puzzles, board games, plush dolls, building sets comprised of wood and plastic building blocksACTIVE
044Providing information via a website featuring issues relating to parenting regarding the health of childrenACTIVE
045Providing information via a web site featuring issues relating to parenting regarding parents and raising children concerning parent/child relationshipsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 19, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 19, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 26, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Feb 25, 2016EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Feb 11, 2016EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Feb 11, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 15, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 14, 2015EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jul 7, 2015EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jul 7, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 12, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Feb 11, 2015EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Feb 6, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Feb 6, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 11, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 25, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jun 24, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jun 24, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jun 4, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jun 4, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 25, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 23, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jan 23, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jan 23, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 23, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Aug 13, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 18, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jun 18, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 29, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
May 13, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 7, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 3, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 3, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 3, 2013ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Nov 27, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Nov 27, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 27, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 6, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 5, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 5, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 7, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2012ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
May 29, 2012PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
May 14, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 9, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 4, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 4, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 4, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 3, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 3, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 3, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 23, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2011ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Dec 1, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 14, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 31, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 21, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 21, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 19, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance