USPTO serial 85270016
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amy E. Carroll
AMY E. CARROLL DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP1500 K ST NW STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1209UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Sunglasses; computer carrying cases; cell phone cases | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Fashion accessories, namely, jewelry and watches | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | All-purpose carrying bags, namely, shoulder bags, tote bags, duffel bags, backpacks, messenger bags and shoe bags for travel; wallets; umbrellas; leather and imitation leather key chains | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Footwear, namely, shoes, boots, loafers, athletic shoes, sandals and slippers; footwear accessories, namely, shoe insoles, shoe inserts for primarily non-orthopedic purposes, anti-slip soles for shoes; clothing, namely, t-shirts, coats, jackets, vests, bathing suits, scarves, gloves, mittens, hats, belts, ties, hosiery; leather and suede apparel, namely, coats, jackets, belts, gloves | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | Hair ornaments, hair bands, barrettes, ponytail holders | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services, on-line retail store services and wholesale store services in the field of sunglasses, fashion accessories, bags, footwear, footwear accessories, clothing, leather and suede apparel and hair ornaments | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 3, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 26, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 15, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |