USPTO serial 85271092
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carl H. Pierce
CARL H. PIERCE REED SMITH LLPPO BOX 7990PHILADELPHIA, PA 19101-7990UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | AUGMENTED SURGICAL INTERFACE CONTROL SYSTEMS, NAMELY, MEDICAL APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR USE IN GENERAL SURGERY AND FOR USE IN THE TRAINING AND SIMULATION OF SURGERY; SURGICAL SYSTEMS WITH SURGICAL EQUIPMENT IN THE NATURE OF AUGMENTED SURGICAL INTERFACES WHICH INCORPORATE SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS, MEDICAL TISSUE IMAGING APPARATUSES, SURGICAL INSTRUMENT MOTION ACTUATORS, POSITION CONTROLLERS AND OPERATOR INTERFACE COMPONENTS, NAMELY, SURGICAL AND MEDICAL APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR USE IN GENERAL SURGERY; MEDICAL DEVICES FOR PERFORMING MICROSURGERY, NAMELY, MEDICAL APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENT FOR CONTROLLING THE MOTION OF SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS WITHIN A SURGICAL FIELD, AND SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS FOR USE IN ASSOCIATION WITH SUCH MEDICAL APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS; MEDICAL TOOLS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR USE IN CONJUNCTION WITH SURGICAL PROCEDURES PERFORMED UTILIZING AUGMENTED SURGICAL INTERFACES, NAMELY, MEDICAL APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR ACCURATELY LOCATING AND POSITIONING AUGMENTED SURGICAL INTERFACES WITH RESPECT TO A SURGICAL FIELD; AUGMENTED SURGICAL SYSTEMS FOR ASSISTING IN THE PERFORMANCE OF SURGICAL PROCEDURES, NAMELY, MEDICAL APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR USE IN GENERAL SURGERY, SURGICAL AND MEDICAL APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS IN THE NATURE OF OPERATOR INPUT MEDICAL APPARATUSES AND OPERATOR DISPLAYS THAT ALLOW AN OPERATOR OF AN AUGMENTED SURGICAL INTERFACE TO CONTROL THE PHYSICAL POSITIONING OF SURGICAL EQUIPMENT IN A SURGICAL FIELD, AUGMENTED SURGICAL APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR CONTROLLING THE POSITION OF AND MOVING SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS WITHIN A SURGICAL FIELD, AND SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS FOR USE IN ASSOCIATION WITH AUGMENTED SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SURGICAL SYSTEMS FOR PROVIDING TRAINING AND SIMULATION CAPABILITIES WITH RESPECT TO SURGICAL PROCEDURES USING AUGMENTED SURGICAL INTERFACES, NAMELY, AUGMENTED SURGICAL INTERFACE MEDICAL APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS HAVING INTERNAL CAPABILITIES FOR GENERATING FEEDBACK TO AN OPERATOR SIMULATING THE DISPLAYS AND CONTROL FEEDBACKS WHICH WOULD BE ENCOUNTERED DURING ACTUAL PERFORMANCE OF A SURGICAL PROCEDURE USING THE AUGMENTED SURGICAL INTERFACE; AUGMENTED SURGICAL INTERFACE CONTROL SYSTEM | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 22, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |