USPTO serial 85274027
SCARECROW TOTAL CROP PROTECTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4188864Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 14, 2012
- Examiner
- SEVERSON, KAREN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SCARECROW TOTAL CROP PROTECTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Charles Parsons (Holdings) Pty Limited
Redfern, NSW 2016, AU
Other trademarks owned by Charles Parsons (Holdings) Pty Limited
Charles Parsons (Holdings) Pty Limited
Sydney NSW 2000, AU
Other trademarks owned by Charles Parsons (Holdings) Pty Limited
Charles Parsons (Holdings) Pty Limited
Sydney NSW 2000, AU
Other trademarks owned by Charles Parsons (Holdings) Pty Limited
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence H. Binderow, Attorney at Law
Lawrence H. Binderow, Attorney at Law BINDEROW LAW OFFICES1330 Camino Del MarSuite 250Del Mar, CA 92014Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Geotextiles, namely, woven high density polyethylene (HDPE) tape weed mats, non-woven spunbound polypropylene weed mats, non-woven polylactic acid fabric weed mats, and weed mat fabric sheets, all laid on top of soil to prevent weeds from growing among planted crops | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 022 | Ropes; string; nets, namely, crop protection nets and insect protection nets; tents; awnings; sails, tarpaulins; textile bags for packaging; bags for the transport and storage of materials in bulk; synthetic fibres for textile use, namely, plastic fibres; Textile goods, namely, shade cloth fabric to protect crops from direct sunlight; textile goods, namely, windbreak fabric to protect crops from wind; textile goods, namely, hail net fabric to cover crops to protect crops from hail damage; textile goods, namely, microclimate fabric to protect crops from temperature fluctuations; textile goods, namely, frost cloth fabric to protect crops from frost; textile goods, namely, harvesting fabric to aid in the collection of fruits, nuts, and agricultural harvests; textile goods, namely, polylactic acid fabrics, polyethylene fabrics, and polypropylene fabrics, all for the protection and harvesting of crops | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 044 | Horticulture services, namely, pest control services; forestry services, namely, pest control | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Charles Parsons (Holdings) Pty Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Charles Parsons (Holdings) Pty Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Charles Parsons (Holdings) Pty Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 022
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named SCARECROW TOTAL CROP PROTECTION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 19, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 29, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 9, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 1, 2012 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 1, 2012 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 2, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |