USPTO serial 85277117
KITCHEN MASTERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAN, DAWN L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KITCHEN MASTERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PALOS VERDES, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHELLE WHITTINGTON
3142 N 82ND WAYMESA, AZ 85207-5815UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Kitchen utensils and gadgets made of plastic, nylon, rubber, stainless steel, aluminum, steel and aluminum alloys, namely spoons, non-electric fruit and vegetable peelers, non-electric can openers, apple and vegetable corers, cutters for wine bottle foil, made of nylon, plastic, rubber, stainless steel, chrome plated steel and steel alloys; dinner flatware, namely, forks, knives and spoons | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Cookware, namely, pots and pans, open stock pots and structural parts thereof, all made of stainless steel, aluminum and carbon steel; kitchen utensils and gadgets made of plastic, nylon, rubber, stainless steel, aluminum and steel and aluminum alloys, namely spatulas, serving spoons, ladles, serving tongs, food basters, brushes for basting food, pot and pan scrapers, whisks, jar openers and flour sifters;wine and bar accessories, bottle stoppers specially adapted for use with wine bottles, and cocktail shakers; salt and pepper shakers; cork screws made of nylon, plastic, rubber, stainless steel, chrome plated steel and steel alloys; tea kettles made of stainless steel, aluminum and carbon steel with and without coatings of paint, copper or porcelain enamel; trash cans for household use made of stainless steel or plastic; strainers and sieves as household utensils made of stainless steel, chrome plated steel and plastic; dinner sets in the nature of plates, bowls, cups, drinking glasses, saucers, serving bowls, serving platters, and open stock pots made of porcelain, stone ware, earthen ware and dolomite; all non-electric kitchenware made of any materials, namely pots, pans, plates, cups and bowls | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2012 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 11, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 29, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |