USPTO serial 85285569
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John L. Slafsky
John L. Slafsky Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati650 Page Mill RoadPalo Alto, CA 94304UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound and images; automatic vending machines and mechanisms for coin-operated apparatus; cash registers, calculating machines, data processing equipment and computers; fire-extinguishing apparatus; semiconductor components, integrated circuits, semiconductor chips, semiconductor chip sets, circuit board assemblies, computer components, electronic components, control software, interface software, communications software, all the aforesaid goods being for use in connection with radio and/or wireless communication transmitters, receivers and synthesizers; semiconductor component layouts in electronic form for use in connection with the design and manufacturing of semiconductors; telecommunications apparatus, instruments, and equipment, namely, switching apparatus, base stations for cellular and fixed networking, change-over switches, computer hardware for telecommunications, electric capacitors, electric resistors, electrical transformers, fuses, indicator lights, microphones, pickups, cables, exchangers, switches, transmitters, and installations made therefrom; modems; telephones; telephone receivers and recorders; electronic navigation apparatus; vehicle location apparatus and instruments; electronic and computer apparatus and instruments for determining precise geographical locations of aircraft, marine vessels, land vehicles, human beings and animals; electronic and computer apparatus and instruments for surveying, mapping, tracking and navigation, namely marine, aviation, land vehicle and human being and animal tracking and navigation; location sensors, software, receivers and transmitters for locating marine, aviation, and land vehicles, human beings, and animals; location systems software and hardware; data carriers pre-recorded with software for surveying, mapping, tracking and navigation, including marine, aviation, land vehicle and human being and animal tracking and navigation; computer hardware and software for use in global positioning and wireless navigation and satellite communications. computer software for improving voice signal quality and the intelligibility of speech content used in voice interface systems, command and control systems, radio intercom systems, microphone systems, wireless communications systems and telecommunications systems; microphone systems comprising a microphone unit and digital signal processors | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development of telecommunications apparatus, instruments and equipment; advice and consultancy in relation to computer networking applications; design and development of computer hardware and software | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 3, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 4, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 9, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 25, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 17, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |