USPTO serial 85286428
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Iliya M. Fridman
ILIYA M. FRIDMAN FRIDMAN LAW GROUP, PLLC287 SPRING STNEW YORK, NY 10013-1406UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for managing data; software for allowing data retrieval, upload, access, distribution and management; computer software for application and database integration; computer software for creating searchable databases of information and data; computer software for organizing and viewing information, digital images, audio visual files, and photographs; computer software for the collection, editing, organizing, modifying, book marking, transmission, publication, distribution, storage and sharing of data and information across global computer, mobile and data networks. Computer application software for mobile devices, namely, software for collecting, editing, organizing, modifying, transmitting, publishing, distributing, storing and sharing data and information | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Application service provider, namely, hosting, managing, developing, and maintaining applications, non-downloadable software, and web sites, in the fields of remote information access and data management for delivery of data and information across global computer, wireless and data networks; computer services, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of information management to host computer application software for the collection, editing, organizing, modifying, book marking, transmission, storage and sharing of data and information; computer technology services, namely, designing and maintaining software in the nature of web applications, mobile device applications and desktop applications; designing and implementing software for creating and managing software architecture, computer system design, communication software design, software management tools, on-line forums, blogs, wikis, community software, intranet and data management systems, custom software applications, and e-commerce and data integration systems; application service provider (ASP) featuring software for streaming, playing, viewing, showing, displaying, sharing, distributing, transmitting, and providing electronic media or information over global computer, mobile and data networks; application services provider featuring application programming interface software for third parties to upload, manage, display and share data and information over global computer, mobile and data networks; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software applications for social networking; computer services in the nature of providing customized on-line web pages featuring user-defined or user-defined specified information, which includes on-line content, namely, personal profiles, audio, video, photographic images, text, graphics and data; peer-to-browser information sharing services, namely, providing a website featuring technology enabling users to upload, view, manage, display, share and download digital videos, photos, text, graphics and data | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 3, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 29, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 4, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 1, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 6, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 3, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |